Taiwan: Environmental Market Analysis
The 1980s marked Taiwan�s environmental coming of age. Rapid economic
development and population growth had placed tremendous strains on the local
environment. The island�s drinking water and air quality had deteriorated
significantly. Public protests mounted against building and citing of
factories that posed threats to public safety and the environment. In
response, the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA) was
formed in 1987 as a cabinet-level agency. In 1992, the government also
announced a six-year "Green Plan" to protect the environment.
Much progress has been achieved in improving both air and water quality,
particularly in the cities, but problems remain in many sectors. Taiwan�s
environmental degradation has reached levels that can be seen and smelled.
It is common to see Taiwanese pedestrians wear surgical masks to prevent the
inhalation of toxic fumes. About 95% of Taiwan�s 21 million people are still
not served by a public sewerage system. Cities still lack proper solid waste
disposal systems, including industrial solid waste treatment or disposal
facilities.
Affluence and a higher standard of living have engendered greater demand
for a better quality of life, and the government has a firm commitment to
improved living standards commensurate with international standards.
However, the economic downturn and lower private investment rates have
reinforced the common notion that green policies can drag down the country�s
international competitiveness. Taiwanese authorities are under pressure to
limit impediments to growth (such as tightened environmental standards) so
that industry can weather the regional crisis. Economic advancement is the
top priority and sustainable development has yet to be fully embraced as
part of the national plan. Environmental protection is considered a luxury,
which affects enforcement of environmental laws. For example, water
discharge standards have been relaxed, and other laws are being poorly
implemented in a bid by the authorities to assist local industries.
Lax enforcement also reduces the incentive to buy pollution control
equipment. Nonetheless, market watchers still expect this sector to grow
5�7% in 1998 and 1999, with many product areas (control equipment for air
pollution, solid waste, and hazardous waste, as well as recycling
technologies) experiencing gains.
MARKET ESTIMATES AND ANALYSIS
"The best prospects for Taiwan will be
high-technology pollution-control equipment and cleaner production
technologies for the semiconductor, petrochemical, pulp and paper, and
electroplating industries." |
According to 1999 reporting estimates made by the U.S. Department of
Commerce Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State officials,
the Pollution Control Equipment sector ranks 12th among leading
industry sectors for U.S. exports and investment in Taiwan for
nonagricultural goods and services based on estimated dollar growth in U.S.
exports from 1998 to 1999 ($18 million). The best prospects for Taiwan will
be high-technology pollution-control equipment and cleaner production
technologies for the semiconductor, petrochemical, pulp and paper, and
electroplating industries.
Total imports are a key element of concern to prospective U.S. exporters.
Imports represent a market�s ability to pay for, or demand, foreign goods.
Imports have been growing consistently since the early 1990s with 1997 being
no exception. The first four months of 1998 have shown considerable
volatility, making forecasts of total import demand fairly uncertain.
Environmental Business International estimates Taiwan�s total market for
environmental goods and services as follows:
Environmental Market in Taiwan 1995-1997 ($ millions)
Market
Segment |
1995 |
1997 |
Growth |
Equipment |
|
|
|
Water Equipment & Chemicals |
360 |
400 |
11.1% |
Air Pollution Control |
600 |
670 |
11.7% |
Instruments & Monitoring |
80 |
90 |
11.7% |
Systems |
|
|
|
Waste Management Equipment |
200 |
220 |
10.0% |
Process & Prevention Technology |
30 |
30 |
0.0% |
Services |
|
|
|
Solid Waste Management |
430 |
480 |
11.6% |
Hazardous Waste Management |
70 |
80 |
14.3% |
Consulting & Engineering |
100 |
110 |
10.0% |
Remediation |
50 |
60 |
20.0% |
Analytical Services |
40 |
40 |
0.0% |
Water Treatment Works (Municipal & Industrial) |
400 |
450 |
12.5% |
Resources |
|
|
|
Water Utilities |
500 |
560 |
12.0% |
Resource Recovery |
50 |
60 |
20.0% |
Total |
2,910 |
3,250 |
11.7% |
Note: Environmental Business International
provided the environmental market analysis and statistical data, using
EBI�s market segmentation framework. The EBI analysis is based on
independent primary research, with extensive interviews with
government officials, industry leaders, and executives of U.S. and
regional environmental companies, as well as information provided by
Paul Clements-Hunt, SGS-Environmental Information Unit, and US-Asia
Environmental Partnership. Information in this report is based on
articles in EBI�s regional newsletter, Asia Environmental Business
Journal, and other references as listed above.
Source: � Environmental Business International, Inc. (San Diego,
California) |
Pollution Control Equipment (U.S.$ millions)
Indicator |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
Total Market Size |
629 |
679 |
712 |
Total Local Production |
195 |
191 |
194 |
Total Exports |
175 |
166 |
161 |
Total Imports |
824 |
870 |
906 |
Total U.S. Imports |
186 |
202 |
220 |
Source: USDOC, 1999 Country Commercial Guide. |
- The Republic of China Yearbook of Environmental Protection Statistics,
Taiwan Area, says industry investment in pollution control equipment in
Taiwan has ranged between $600 million and $1.1 billion per year since the
early 1990s.
- An Industry Subsector Analysis for Taiwan prepared by the U.S.
Department of Commerce in 1996 indicates that Taiwan�s total environmental
equipment market reached its peak during 1993, totaling $1.3 billion.
- This number dropped in 1994 by almost half to $746 million, but
increased again in 1995 to $775 million, and was expected to reach $829
million in 1996.
- According to this DOC/ISA report, the market is expected to grow at a
rate of 20�25% throughout 1999.
- The Department of Commerce�s 1996 Country Commercial Guide for Taiwan
shows growth from $700 million in 1994 to $770 million in 1995 to $840
million in 1996.
- Taiwan�s environmental equipment market totaled $1.4 billion in 1997,
according to EBI, Inc. The 1999 Country Commercial Guide estimates
reported lower figures, most likely accounting for affects of the
financial crisis of 1997: $629 million in 1997, $679 million in 1998, and
$712 million in 1999.
- Using EBI�s figures, Taiwan's total environmental market becomes $3.25
billion in 1997, almost a 12% increase over 1995 estimates.
- According to TEPA, the total environmental equipment market in 1992
was $1.6 billion, and is expected to reach $4.3 billion by 2002.
Comparable Market Estimates
Market Estimate |
Environmental Equipment Market, 1995 |
Estimated Growth Rate |
Primary Sources of Data |
DOC/Taiwan Environmental Technologies Export Market
Plan, 1998 |
$672 million |
10% |
Yearbook of Environmental Protection Statistics, Taiwan
Area, the Republic of China |
DOC/ISA for Taiwan�s Industrial Waste Treatment
Equipment, 1996 |
$775 million |
20�25% |
Industrial Technology Research Institute,
Industrial Development Bureau |
DOC/Taiwan Country Commercial Guide, 1996 |
$770 million |
NA |
Unofficial Statistics of the US DOC |
EBI, Inc., 1997 |
$1.4 million |
10% |
Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration |
Imported Environmental Equipment: Market
Composition By Equipment Type

Source: China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs
Import Monthly
The table below shows the composition of the environmental equipment
import market. The majority of the market is pollution prevention equipment.
Imported Environmental Equipment: Market Growth
Rates By Equipment Type (U.S. $1,000)

Source: China External Trade Development Council,
ROC Customs Import Monthly Statistics
- Total environmental equipment markets increased by 6% in 1995, then
decreased by 9% in 1996, and increased again by 14% in 1997.
- While both water treatment and pollution prevention markets dropped by
almost 30%, those markets rebounded by almost the same amount in 1997.
- Control equipment for treatment of industrial liquids has shown a
steady increase, averaging almost 28% growth between 1994 and 1997.
- The Taiwanese environmental import markets are moving in a positive
direction despite the Asian financial crisis.
Taiwan�s Domestic Production�Targets for U.S. Environmental Firms
Manufacturing is still the largest single contributor to GDP and the
source of most environmental problems. The four leading manufacturing
sectors are the industries that U.S. environmental companies need to target.
The electrical and electronics sector in particular is forecast to be
relatively "crisis resistant" as a result of Taiwan�s secure worldwide
position. These sectors have major environmental problems and need
environmental controls. These sectors are also growing and, as a result, are
better able to pay for environmental equipment and services than other
sectors.
The Four
Leading Manufacturing Sectors in Taiwan |
- Chemical Materials
- Chemical Products
- Petroleum
- Electrical and Electronic Machinery
|
Sectors of Manufacturing Growth 1990-1998

Targeted Industrial/Environmental Sectors
Air Pollution
Air pollution markets are excellent candidates for U.S. technologies,
especially for power, cement, iron and steel, and petrochemical plants.
Taiwan is in the process of switching to lead-free fuels. This presents a
possible opportunity for U.S. firms. Because this conversion is not due for
implementation until 2000, with possible delays until 2003, we rank this
longer term opportunity as a lower priority.
Volatile organic compound (VOC) controls represent a potential market for
U.S. firms in the medium term. In addition to the synthetic leather
industry, the growing electronics industry is VOC-intensive because solvents
are heavily used in manufacturing integrated circuits, condensers, and other
electrical components. The electronics industry is growing in double digits
and new VOC regulations were due in January 1999. Now is the time to start
making overtures about U.S. technologies.
Water and Wastewater Treatment Control
We believe that industrial water and wastewater treatment should be
elevated as one of the highest priority markets for U.S. businesses for
three reasons:
- U.S. manufacturers have some of the most cost-effective technologies
for treating water and wastewater in the world and can compete with any
foreign producer.
- New water quality regulations with financial enforcement are on the
way.
- Industries with high loadings are continuing to expand even through
the Asian crisis.
Water pollution control fees were supposed to be implemented starting
July 1, 1998. We suggest identifying target industries and companies that
will have to pay excessive fees under this new enforcement regime. It is our
understanding that wastewater flows and permits, as would exist under the
U.S. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, are not available in
Taiwan. However, it may be possible to obtain relevant information through
the use of industrial surveys.
Once data is collected regarding Taiwanese companies that will have to
pay high fees for wastewater discharges, this list should be communicated to
a pre-qualified list of export-ready U.S. firms. If U.S. firms are not ready
to export but interested in market opportunities, the U.S. Department of
Commerce can help prepare them.
Toxic/Hazardous Waste
It appears that toxic/hazardous waste is a very soft market because of
the lack of enforcement. Hazardous waste does not have to be characterized
in Taiwan as in the U.S. Hazardous waste companies and haulers as well as
the marketing of hazardous waste landfills should be considered a prospect
in the long term and a low priority.
Municipal Solid Waste
The municipal solid waste market is subject to some controversy. It is a
long and arduous process that U.S. companies such as Laidlaw, Rollins, and
USPCI understand very well. Although the Japanese were the first to sell BOT/BOO
incinerators to Taiwan, public backlash against incomplete
combustion-producing dioxins from Japanese technologies may open the door
for U.S. firms.
Sludge Treatment
The sludge treatment market is driven more by recovery economics than by
regulatory compliance. Probably fewer than 15 U.S. companies could provide
recovery services in Taiwan. Internet searches could produce a list of such
companies quickly. These companies should ask for a sample analysis of the
sludge and the concentration of the target material to be covered. Many U.S.
firms can tell immediately if there is a commercial opportunity from the
sample analysis alone.
Groundwater and Soil Treatment
The groundwater and soil treatment market is probably four to five years
in the future, maybe longer depending on Taiwan's economic condition in
upcoming years. In addition, Taiwanese companies will not be receptive to
traditional "pump and treat" groundwater treatment technologies that have
uncertain effectiveness and unknown termination. We classify this sector as
a low priority.
Infrastructure Projects
According to TEPA, investments in the government's Six-Year Plan will
total $12 billion. It is estimated that the average annual growth stemming
from infrastructure developments will reach 20% for the next 10 years,
second to the aerospace industry. The infrastructure program, however, has
been beset by delays attributed to bureaucratic hurdles and public
opposition. Taiwan relies heavily on nuclear energy, for instance, but the
fourth nuclear power plant has created intense political controversy.
Meanwhile, public interest groups have led protests against construction of
factories viewed as threats to public safety and the environment. The
government�s frustration with delays in infrastructure projects has led to
efforts to privatize development and operations of incinerators on the
island.
The imported environmental equipment market may be much smaller than the
infrastructure projects market in total dollar amounts. However, for many
small- and medium-sized companies, small equipment sales may be a much more
realistic goal than multibillion-dollar infrastructure projects.
As shown in the following table, the exporting country market share of
Taiwan imports has been fairly steady since 1990. Japan continues to be the
largest exporter of goods and services to Taiwan with just under $30 billion
in exports in 1997, which represents 25% of Taiwan�s total import market.
The U.S. is the second largest exporter with a total of $23 billion and a
20% share. With exports of approximately $5 billion each, Germany, Korea,
and France are the next largest exporters to Taiwan. After the first four
months of 1998, Japanese market share increased by roughly 2.5% (23.35 to
25.93%) while U.S. market share fell approximately 4.5% (22.01 to 17.32%).
This data does not constitute a trend but imports should be watched closely.
Share of Imports by Country
Year & Month |
Japan |
Republic of Korea |
France |
Germany |
U.S |
1990 |
29.24% |
2.46% |
2.07% |
4.96% |
23.05% |
1991 |
30.00% |
2.78% |
1.81% |
4.79% |
22.45% |
1992 |
30.23% |
3.20% |
1.95% |
5.44% |
21.90% |
1993 |
30.09% |
3.29% |
1.65% |
5.48% |
21.70% |
1994 |
29.04% |
3.53% |
1.71% |
5.61% |
21.14% |
1995 |
29.23% |
4.18% |
1.72% |
5.49% |
20.06% |
1996 |
26.86% |
4.07% |
3.97% |
4.91% |
19.51% |
1997 |
25.36% |
4.39% |
4.13% |
4.69% |
20.31% |
1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
April |
25.73% |
4.17% |
3.39% |
4.69% |
19.94% |
May |
24.77% |
4.64% |
1.85% |
5.01% |
21.35% |
June |
26.21% |
4.22% |
3.24% |
4.73% |
20.71% |
July |
25.91% |
4.38% |
3.63% |
4.90% |
21.42% |
August |
24.37% |
4.06% |
7.38% |
4.40% |
18.41% |
September |
26.36% |
4.34% |
2.27% |
4.79% |
19.12% |
October |
26.98% |
4.98% |
2.01% |
4.25% |
18.51% |
November |
24.65% |
5.07% |
4.33% |
4.96% |
20.59% |
December |
24.37% |
4.06% |
8.12% |
4.15% |
21.91% |
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
January |
23.35% |
4.96% |
4.02% |
4.53% |
22.01% |
February |
27.65% |
4.86% |
3.04% |
4.17% |
22.05% |
March |
27.05% |
5.37% |
3.75% |
4.53% |
19.34% |
April |
25.93% |
5.24% |
7.71% |
4.52% |
17.32% |
1998 avg. |
25.99% |
5.11% |
4.63% |
4.44% |
20.18% |
One of the greatest barriers to market entry is rigid competition. In the
government sector, market penetration by foreign companies is impeded by
stiff competition from large, quasi-government engineering firms and a
plethora of mom-and-pop engineering companies with good connections. Apart
from the problem of having "prearranged bid winners," the Taiwanese
government has placed strict limitations on foreign ownership and operation
of facilities. With every success story, there is a trail of firms that have
packed up and closed shop.
Environmental Equipment
U.S.-sourced equipment holds a prominent share in environmental equipment
sales. Historically, American firms with leading-edge technologies have
dominated the public sector, while private firms prefer Japanese companies
because of lower prices and more accessible customer service. U.S. providers
are generally recognized by Taiwan officials as leaders in environmental
technology.
In some types of equipment, such as compressors, coolers, water filters,
and filter parts, U.S. firms hold a commanding lead. This lead has been
widening in the last two years. In other areas, such as compressor parts,
blowers, gas filters, humidifiers, and dehumidifiers, Japan holds a
substantial lead. DOC data suggest, however, that American environmental
technology has gained an increasing share of the industrial market in recent
years due to Taiwan�s efforts to diversify equipment sourcing.
Environmental Equipment Leading Suppliers
U.S. |
Japan |
Compressors |
Compressor Parts |
Coolers |
Blowers |
Water Filters |
Gas Filters |
Filter Parts |
Humidifiers & Dehumidifiers |
However, the US-Asia Environmental Partnership (US-AEP, Taipei) warns
that U.S. suppliers must change the market perception that technology
developed and commercialized in U.S. markets is not as suitable for local
conditions as technology from Japan. There is also the perception that U.S.
equipment providers do not offer reliable follow-up service or local
support. Nevertheless, U.S. firms may have the advantage in advanced
treatment capabilities as standards are tightened.
"The key to surviving in Taiwan�s competitive
environmental markets is a strategic long-term approach.... players
must emphasize localization and integration of Taiwan-based
capabilities. In general, it is no longer possible to compete through
technical superiority and expertise." |
The key to surviving in Taiwan�s competitive environmental markets is a
strategic long-term approach. Taiwan�s markets are extremely tough and
players must emphasize localization and integration of Taiwan-based
capabilities. In general, it is no longer possible to compete through
technical superiority and expertise. The government has fostered the
transfer of technology that has, in some sectors, established reputable
domestic players. Without the home field advantage, foreign companies are
tackling opponents their own size and competition is price sensitive.
The following chart gives vital statistics on Taiwan�s domestic
environmental business sector in 1992 and projections for 2002.
Taiwan's Environmental Business Sector
Indicator |
1992 |
2002 (est.) |
Production Value |
1,324 |
3,759 |
Average Annual Growth |
11% |
11% |
Number of Companies |
550 |
750 |
Average Production per Company ($millions) |
2.4 |
5.01 |
Number of Employees |
12,000 |
20,000 |
Average Production per Employee |
110,000 |
180,000 |
Exports ($millions) |
75 |
464 |
Imports ($millions) |
384 |
996 |
Domestic Demand ($millions) |
1,633 |
4,291 |
Ratio Domestic to Export Sales |
96:6 |
86:14 |
R&D as Percent of Total Sales |
1% |
1% |
Professional/Technical Employees as Percent of Total
Employees |
50% |
65% |
Source: TEPA |
Consulting and Engineering
Taiwan�s export-oriented companies are aware of increasing international
trade pressures. Standards such as ISO 14000 and multilateral initiatives
have sharpened the focus on environmental solutions. While not a member of
the United Nations, Taiwan adheres to the Montreal Protocol on Substances
that Deplete the Ozone Layer and the Basel Convention on the Control of
Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal. There is a
growing belief that to be competitive internationally, industry must comply
with international standards. Somewhat reluctantly, they are beginning to
see the need for environmental consulting and engineering services in this
area.
However, industries tend to think that consulting and engineering
services should be provided free of charge. These services are typically
part of the package to obtain the hardware contract. Nonetheless, this view
has not impeded the development of Taiwan�s domestic consulting and
engineering sector.
Taiwan�s engineering/construction sector is dominated by large,
government-supported entities and multinational engineering firms. Of these,
the so-called "Big Five" -- China Technical Consultants (CTCI), RETSER,
China Engineering (CECI), BES Engineering, and Sinotech Engineering
Consultants, Ltd. -- have the strongest presence in Taiwan and focus mainly
on the public sector.
Major Consulting and Engineering Firms in Taiwan
Firm |
Staff |
BES |
4,500 |
China Engineering |
1,705 |
CTCI |
1,556 |
Sinotech Engineering |
1,230 |
PECL |
725 |
RETSER |
450 |
Moh & Associates |
354 |
Fu-tai Engineering |
348 |
Gibsin Engineers |
312 |
Super Max Engineering |
110 |
Cambridge Engineering |
70 |
Continental Water |
N/A |
Source: � Asia Environmental Business Journal |
Within the last decade, around 350 small, private firms also have
emerged, comprising the majority of the Taiwan Environmental Engineering
Association. These firms tend to focus on niche areas, such as municipal and
industrial wastewater treatment. Large, state-run and private companies have
also diversified into the local environmental market. Some foreign firms,
mainly U.S. multinationals, have established a presence through
representative arrangements. The Ministry of Economic Affairs� Industrial
Development Bureau has funded government consulting through the Industrial
Technology Research Institute (Taiwan, Hsinchu).
Given the country�s protectionist policies, foreign companies have found
it difficult to establish a strong presence in Taiwan. Some regulations
require foreign companies to bid as subcontractors, limiting foreign
ownership to 30%. As a result, foreign companies are forced into
project-specific partnering relationships with local companies where
technology cooperation and/or subcontracting roles are expected. In effect,
this forces foreign companies into subsidizing the training of local company
staff and giving market share away in the long term.
Where domestic technical capabilities do exist, foreign companies are at
a disadvantage. For example, Taiwanese engineering companies have been
awarded a large majority of the $4.2 billion allocated for construction of
the municipal wastewater treatment system, although foreign firms did
participate in the planning and basic design phases.
Major U.S. Consulting and Engineering Firms Operating in
Taiwan
Firm |
Staff |
ERM |
45 |
CH2M Hill/OMI |
20 |
ICF Kaiser International |
18 |
Camp Dresser Mckee |
15 |
Montgomery Watson |
10 |
International Technology |
N/A |
Source: � Asia Environmental Business Journal |
Technological advantage is also rapidly diminishing for foreign firms
because technology transfer-based relationships with foreign firms have
fostered the development of a highly competitive domestic engineering
capability. For example, Super Max Engineering Enterprise Co., one of the
top Taiwanese consulting and engineering firms, has acquired
state-of-the-art technology from Fuji Kasui Engineering of Japan.
Today, foreign companies are playing on relatively equal ground.
Competition is based on pricing and contacts. Foreign firms are forced to
localize, establish branch offices, or embark on joint ventures with local
companies. International Technology Corp. (IT, Torrance, California)
recently acquired a 50% stake in $12 million Chi Mei Scientech/Entech, part
of the Chi Mei Group, a multinational manufacturing and trading company and
the largest privately held firm in Taiwan.
Many foreign firms believe that doing business in Taiwan may provide an
entry into China. Taiwan�s economy is closely integrated with Mainland
China, and some Taiwanese companies have established representative or
branch offices there. IT�s foray into Taiwan, for example, is intended as a
platform for future expansion into China and other Asian countries. SuperMax
has established offices in Hanzhou, Zeijiang province, and Beijing. On
average, the Taiwan-based offices of U.S. environmental firms report that
15�20% of their regional business comes from China. U.S. consulting and
engineering players like ICF Kaiser and Camp Dresser & McKee use Taiwan to
support regional work.
The Imported Environmental Equipment Market by Country
- Japan and the U.S. accounted for over 60% of the total environmental
equipment import market between 1994 and 1996.
- In 1997, Germany increased its market share from 6 to 20%�a
significant jump.
- This increase in market share was taken from both the U.S. and the
Japanese, which lost 5% and 6% respectively.
Imported Environmental Equipment: Market Share
Composition By Exporting Country (U.S. $1,000)
Source: China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs
Import Monthly
Loss of U.S. Market Share
"The U.S. has lost market share to Japan, Germany,
the UK, Italy, South Korea, and even to Mainland China. While these
market shares represent small absolute dollar amounts, the trends are
nevertheless reason for concern for the U.S. environmental industry." |
As the following table shows, U.S. environmental equipment exports to
Taiwan have been declining since 1995, although the total market has been
increasing. The U.S. has lost market share to Japan, Germany, the UK, Italy,
South Korea, and even to Mainland China. While these market shares represent
small absolute dollar amounts, the trends are nevertheless reason for
concern for the U.S. environmental industry. These numbers are not
estimates, but actual sums of equipment orders passing through Taiwan
customs.
Imported Environmental Equipment: Market Share
Growth By Exporting Country (U.S. $1,000)

Source: China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs
Import Monthly Statistics
The U.S. seems to be losing market share in a traditionally strong market
for U.S. companies. Germany increased its environmental equipment sales to
Taiwan by $65 million between 1996 and 1997. As shown in the table below,
$12 million in German sales came from the water treatment equipment segment.
During the same period, the U.S. only lost $1 million in sales, but gave up
14% of the total market share. We highly recommend an investigation into
which German companies are increasing their sales and why, which customers
are switching suppliers, and which specific U.S. technologies are losing
ground.
Water Treatment Equipment by Exporting Country (U.S.
$1,000)

Source: China External Trade Development
Council, ROC Customs Import Monthly Statistics
Pollution prevention equipment is broadly defined by the Taiwan
government as a combination of "end-of-pipe" technologies and some
process-modification equipment. As shown in the table below, this segment
recovered in 1997. However, the U.S. lost market dominance. Germany again
took market share away from both Japan and the U.S.
Pollution Prevention Equipment By Exporting Country (U.S.
$1,000)

Source: China External Trade Development Council,
ROC Customs Import Monthly Statistics
In 1992, the government launched a six-year "Green Plan" for a healthy
environment. The plan proposed 19 measures, including financial incentives
to encourage private firms to install environmentally beneficial systems and
develop environmental technologies to build up domestic capability. Goals
and objectives for four areas of environmental protection are listed below.
Environmental Protection in the Six-Year Development Plan
Solid
Waste Management |
Goal |
- Raise the rate of proper garbage treatment to 85% and garbage
incineration to 50%.
- Privatize 25% of the construction of large-scale garbage
incinerators.
|
Plan |
- Build 21 garbage incinerators. After completion, daily garbage
incineration will be over 17,000 tons.
- Build 23 district landfills, 55 general landfills.
- Improve clearance and transportation equipment.
- Practice garbage classification and recycling.
|
Industrial
Waste Treatment |
Goal |
- Treat 45% of industrial waste, whose value is about 6.8 million
tons per year.
- Treat 45% of medical waste, whose volume is about 35,000 tons
per year.
- Treat 40% of construction waste earth, whose volume is about 56
million cubic meters per year.
|
Plan |
- Construct a model incinerator [Republic of China Environmental
Protection Agency (ROC EPA)]. Industrial waste centers will be built
in the north, center, and south of the island. Private treatment
plants are also encouraged.
- Assist individual hospitals in establishing hospital waste
incineration co-treatment centers (The National Health Administrator
of ROC).
- Assist local governments in planning and constructing waste
earth disposal ground (The Ministry of Interior).
- Promote the reduction of industrial waste.
|
Water
Pollution Prevention |
Goal |
- Complete clean-up plan of 44 rivers and the cleanup for 10 other
seriously polluted rivers.
- Reduce industrial waste pollution by 76%, farming wastewater by
73%, and household wastewater by 27%.
|
Plan |
- Clean up the Tamsui River with a total budget of $1.5 billion.
- Enlist 16,000 pollution-causing businesses, including factories,
mineral fields, pig farms, hospitals, schools, and tourist hotels to
encourage their controls.
- Initiate clean-up programs for Keelung, Taichung, and Kaohsiung
harbors.
|
Air
Pollution Control |
Goal |
- Reduce the amount of harmful air pollution index (PSI>100)
during the day to 10% for the northern, 5% for the central, and 0%
for the eastern district of the island.
|
Plan |
- Gradually tighten emission standards for automobiles,
motorcycles, and diesel trucks.
- Reinforce the supply of low-pollution fuel.
- Strengthen the auditing of factories regarding emissions.
- Expand the island-wide air quality monitoring station network.
- Reduce CFC consumption, leading to an entire ban by 1995.
|
Source: Taiwan EPA (TEPA) |
Environmental Agencies
TEPA institutes regulations and policies, relying on established models,
such as the U.S. EPA's regulatory framework. For example, industrial solid
waste regulations are modeled after the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, incorporating the "cradle-to-grave" philosophy. Hazardous waste and air
pollution control policies also follow the U.S. example. TEPA�s
administrative partner is the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB), which
provides technical assistance and financial incentives aimed at bringing
industry into compliance.
Local Government Focus
Taiwan
Environmental Protection (TEPA) |
Sector Priority:
- Municipal solid waste
- Industrial waste
- Municipal wastewater
- Air pollution
|
Key Issues:
- Private sector involvement
- Recycling framework
- Medical waste
- Hazardous waste treatment
- Sewage system development
- Industrial point source
|
Industrial
Development Bureau (IDA) |
Sector Priority:
- Industrial solid waste
- Industrial wastewater
- Air pollution
- Air toxics/VOCs
|
Key Issues:
- Hospitals/Medical facilities
- Petrochemical industry
- Chemical industry
- Nonwoven fiber production
- Dyeing industry
- Petroleum refining
- Paper and pulp industry
- Food processing
- Metal finishing
- Electroplating
- Surface coating
- Electronics
- Slaughtering/Animal husbandry
- Iron and steel
- Power plants
- Cement
- Printing
- Dry cleaning
|
Source: US-Asia Environmental
Partnership (US-AEP) |
The Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) implements regulatory programs
within each county and municipality of Taipei and Kaohsiung. The
Environmental Protection Department (EPD) supervises EPB. The municipal
governments of Taipei and Kaohsiung have their own EPDs.
Environmental Legislation
Taiwan's environmental legislation focuses on four main "P" principles:
polluter pays, public participation, privatization, and pollution
prevention.
Major
Environmental Laws and Amendments |
- Air Pollution Control Act (February 1993)
- Water Pollution Control Act (May 1991)
- Solid Waste Disposal Act (May 1989)
- Toxic Chemical Control Act (November 1988)
- Noise Control Act (February 1992)
|
TEPA promulgated a new definition of waste that dramatically increased
the types of wastes defined as hazardous. It also began implementing an air
emissions permitting program and the industrial wastewater monitoring and
self-reporting system, and promulgated VOC emission standards for the
automotive and coatings industry. In the process of adopting regulations,
however, TEPA has also underestimated the need to "localize" many U.S.-based
regulations.
Environmental Budgets
After overestimating its resource allocations at $36 billion for
environmental spending, the government was forced to reduce its spending
plan for 1992�1997 to $12 billion. Of the total, about 80% will come from
government and state-owned firms. The private sector is expected to lag
behind until enforcement begins in 1996, accounting for the longer term
market potential. The bulk of expenditures will be on municipal solid waste
and municipal wastewater.
Environmental Awareness
As a by-product of the democratization process in government, public
participation in environmental issues has gained momentum. The "not in my
back yard" (NIMBY) syndrome has developed in Taiwan, raising compliance
levels among industry. The push from nongovernmental organizations has had
some success in rousing popular interest among the emerging educated and
affluent middle class.
However, public interest in the environment has also backfired, delaying
some badly needed environmental infrastructure. Consequently, many public
sector-financed projects have not progressed to the construction stage as
anticipated. These projects included waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration
plants and integrated industrial/hazardous waste treatment facilities.
Enforcement
The link between regulation and demand for environmental technologies is
enforcement, which will improve with the maturation of TEPA and
implementation of wastewater, air permitting, and reporting systems. In
short, the screws on industry are being tightened, albeit slowly, and many
local industries are beginning to respond.
Soil and groundwater remediation became an issue in
1995, not because of specific regulations (there are only minimal laws
in this area) but as an offshoot of a political scandal that occurred
in the run-up to the 1994 election. A developer tried to rezone a
large parcel of industrial land for commercial and residential use. A
former EPA administrator running for mayor of Taipei revealed that the
site contained contaminated soil and groundwater. Thereafter, the
government restricted the rezoning of any industrial land without an
environmental impact assessment. This policy has resulted in new
interest by local industry in site assessments and remediation. |
Enforcement, however, is limited by trained manpower shortages, lack of
administrative systems, and political lethargy. Taiwan�s industry is still
partially state owned, and the government controls most of the heavy
industries sector. Because the government is directly intertwined with
industry, compliance is not always a factor as a market driver. For example,
the state-run petrochemical company has invested heavily in the cleanup of
soil and groundwater contamination although TEPA has yet to promulgate
relevant regulations.
Although the total number of citations and fines levied has not changed
significantly since 1990, the number of inspections has grown considerably.
If increased inspection rates are a precursor to greater penalties in the
future, we can expect polluters to increase their investments in
environmental technologies.
Environmental Enforcement By Media, 1990-1998

It is difficult to get the many small and medium-sized manufacturers to
comply with environmental regulations. To counter this, local governments
are seeking greater control over environmental project implementation and
regulatory enforcement. |