export
markets
country
comparisons
helpful
hints
export
links
site
map
Back to Export Advisor
Taiwan

Taiwan:  Environmental Market Analysis

COUNTRY OVERVIEW

The 1980s marked Taiwan�s environmental coming of age. Rapid economic development and population growth had placed tremendous strains on the local environment. The island�s drinking water and air quality had deteriorated significantly. Public protests mounted against building and citing of factories that posed threats to public safety and the environment. In response, the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA) was formed in 1987 as a cabinet-level agency. In 1992, the government also announced a six-year "Green Plan" to protect the environment.

Much progress has been achieved in improving both air and water quality, particularly in the cities, but problems remain in many sectors. Taiwan�s environmental degradation has reached levels that can be seen and smelled. It is common to see Taiwanese pedestrians wear surgical masks to prevent the inhalation of toxic fumes. About 95% of Taiwan�s 21 million people are still not served by a public sewerage system. Cities still lack proper solid waste disposal systems, including industrial solid waste treatment or disposal facilities.

Affluence and a higher standard of living have engendered greater demand for a better quality of life, and the government has a firm commitment to improved living standards commensurate with international standards. However, the economic downturn and lower private investment rates have reinforced the common notion that green policies can drag down the country�s international competitiveness. Taiwanese authorities are under pressure to limit impediments to growth (such as tightened environmental standards) so that industry can weather the regional crisis. Economic advancement is the top priority and sustainable development has yet to be fully embraced as part of the national plan. Environmental protection is considered a luxury, which affects enforcement of environmental laws.  For example, water discharge standards have been relaxed, and other laws are being poorly implemented in a bid by the authorities to assist local industries.

Lax enforcement also reduces the incentive to buy pollution control equipment. Nonetheless, market watchers still expect this sector to grow 5�7% in 1998 and 1999, with many product areas (control equipment for air pollution, solid waste, and hazardous waste, as well as recycling technologies) experiencing gains.

MARKET ESTIMATES AND ANALYSIS

"The best prospects for Taiwan will be high-technology pollution-control equipment and cleaner production technologies for the semiconductor, petrochemical, pulp and paper, and electroplating industries."

According to 1999 reporting estimates made by the U.S. Department of Commerce Foreign Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State officials, the Pollution Control Equipment sector ranks 12th among leading industry sectors for U.S. exports and investment in Taiwan for nonagricultural goods and services based on estimated dollar growth in U.S. exports from 1998 to 1999 ($18 million). The best prospects for Taiwan will be high-technology pollution-control equipment and cleaner production technologies for the semiconductor, petrochemical, pulp and paper, and electroplating industries.

Total imports are a key element of concern to prospective U.S. exporters. Imports represent a market�s ability to pay for, or demand, foreign goods. Imports have been growing consistently since the early 1990s with 1997 being no exception. The first four months of 1998 have shown considerable volatility, making forecasts of total import demand fairly uncertain.

Environmental Business International estimates Taiwan�s total market for environmental goods and services as follows:

Environmental Market in Taiwan 1995-1997 ($ millions)

Market Segment 

1995

1997

Growth

Equipment

 

 

 

Water Equipment & Chemicals

360

400

11.1%

Air Pollution Control

600

670

11.7%

Instruments & Monitoring

80

90

11.7%

Systems

 

 

 

Waste Management Equipment

200

220

10.0%

Process & Prevention Technology

30

30

0.0%

Services

 

 

 

Solid Waste Management

430

480

11.6%

Hazardous Waste Management

70

80

14.3%

Consulting & Engineering

100

110

10.0%

Remediation

50

60

20.0%

Analytical Services

40

40

0.0%

Water Treatment Works (Municipal & Industrial)

400

450

12.5%

Resources

 

 

 

Water Utilities

500

560

12.0%

Resource Recovery

50

60

20.0%

Total

2,910

3,250

11.7%

Note: Environmental Business International provided the environmental market analysis and statistical data, using EBI�s market segmentation framework. The EBI analysis is based on independent primary research, with extensive interviews with government officials, industry leaders, and executives of U.S. and regional environmental companies, as well as information provided by Paul Clements-Hunt, SGS-Environmental Information Unit, and US-Asia Environmental Partnership. Information in this report is based on articles in EBI�s regional newsletter, Asia Environmental Business Journal, and other references as listed above.
Source: � Environmental Business International, Inc. (San Diego, California)

 

Pollution Control Equipment (U.S.$ millions)

Indicator

1997

1998

1999

Total Market Size

629

679

712

Total Local Production

195

191

194

Total Exports

175

166

161

Total Imports

824

870

906

Total U.S. Imports

186

202

220

Source: USDOC, 1999 Country Commercial Guide.

 

  • The Republic of China Yearbook of Environmental Protection Statistics, Taiwan Area, says industry investment in pollution control equipment in Taiwan has ranged between $600 million and $1.1 billion per year since the early 1990s.
  • An Industry Subsector Analysis for Taiwan prepared by the U.S. Department of Commerce in 1996 indicates that Taiwan�s total environmental equipment market reached its peak during 1993, totaling $1.3 billion.
  • This number dropped in 1994 by almost half to $746 million, but increased again in 1995 to $775 million, and was expected to reach $829 million in 1996.
  • According to this DOC/ISA report, the market is expected to grow at a rate of 20�25% throughout 1999.
  • The Department of Commerce�s 1996 Country Commercial Guide for Taiwan shows growth from $700 million in 1994 to $770 million in 1995 to $840 million in 1996.
  • Taiwan�s environmental equipment market totaled $1.4 billion in 1997, according to EBI, Inc. The 1999 Country Commercial Guide estimates reported lower figures, most likely accounting for affects of the financial crisis of 1997: $629 million in 1997, $679 million in 1998, and $712 million in 1999.
  • Using EBI�s figures, Taiwan's total environmental market becomes $3.25 billion in 1997, almost a 12% increase over 1995 estimates.
  • According to TEPA, the total environmental equipment market in 1992 was $1.6 billion, and is expected to reach $4.3 billion by 2002.
Comparable Market Estimates

Market Estimate

Environmental Equipment Market, 1995

Estimated Growth Rate

Primary Sources of Data

DOC/Taiwan Environmental Technologies Export Market Plan, 1998

$672 million

10%

Yearbook of Environmental Protection Statistics, Taiwan Area, the Republic of China

DOC/ISA for Taiwan�s Industrial Waste Treatment Equipment, 1996

$775 million

20�25%

Industrial Technology Research Institute,
Industrial Development Bureau

DOC/Taiwan Country Commercial Guide, 1996

$770 million

NA

Unofficial Statistics of the US DOC

EBI, Inc., 1997

$1.4 million

10%

Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration

 

Imported Environmental Equipment:  Market Composition By Equipment Type

Source:  China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs Import Monthly

 

The table below shows the composition of the environmental equipment import market. The majority of the market is pollution prevention equipment.

Imported Environmental Equipment:  Market Growth Rates By Equipment Type (U.S. $1,000)

Source:  China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs Import Monthly Statistics

 

  • Total environmental equipment markets increased by 6% in 1995, then decreased by 9% in 1996, and increased again by 14% in 1997.
  • While both water treatment and pollution prevention markets dropped by almost 30%, those markets rebounded by almost the same amount in 1997.
  • Control equipment for treatment of industrial liquids has shown a steady increase, averaging almost 28% growth between 1994 and 1997.
  • The Taiwanese environmental import markets are moving in a positive direction despite the Asian financial crisis.

Taiwan�s Domestic Production�Targets for U.S. Environmental Firms

Manufacturing is still the largest single contributor to GDP and the source of most environmental problems. The four leading manufacturing sectors are the industries that U.S. environmental companies need to target. The electrical and electronics sector in particular is forecast to be relatively "crisis resistant" as a result of Taiwan�s secure worldwide position. These sectors have major environmental problems and need environmental controls. These sectors are also growing and, as a result, are better able to pay for environmental equipment and services than other sectors.

The Four Leading Manufacturing Sectors in Taiwan

  • Chemical Materials
  • Chemical Products
  • Petroleum
  • Electrical and Electronic Machinery

 

Sectors of Manufacturing Growth 1990-1998

 

Targeted Industrial/Environmental Sectors

Air Pollution

Air pollution markets are excellent candidates for U.S. technologies, especially for power, cement, iron and steel, and petrochemical plants. Taiwan is in the process of switching to lead-free fuels. This presents a possible opportunity for U.S. firms. Because this conversion is not due for implementation until 2000, with possible delays until 2003, we rank this longer term opportunity as a lower priority.

Volatile organic compound (VOC) controls represent a potential market for U.S. firms in the medium term. In addition to the synthetic leather industry, the growing electronics industry is VOC-intensive because solvents are heavily used in manufacturing integrated circuits, condensers, and other electrical components. The electronics industry is growing in double digits and new VOC regulations were due in January 1999. Now is the time to start making overtures about U.S. technologies.

Water and Wastewater Treatment Control

We believe that industrial water and wastewater treatment should be elevated as one of the highest priority markets for U.S. businesses for three reasons:

  • U.S. manufacturers have some of the most cost-effective technologies for treating water and wastewater in the world and can compete with any foreign producer.
  • New water quality regulations with financial enforcement are on the way.
  • Industries with high loadings are continuing to expand even through the Asian crisis.

Water pollution control fees were supposed to be implemented starting July 1, 1998. We suggest identifying target industries and companies that will have to pay excessive fees under this new enforcement regime. It is our understanding that wastewater flows and permits, as would exist under the U.S. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, are not available in Taiwan. However, it may be possible to obtain relevant information through the use of industrial surveys.

Once data is collected regarding Taiwanese companies that will have to pay high fees for wastewater discharges, this list should be communicated to a pre-qualified list of export-ready U.S. firms. If U.S. firms are not ready to export but interested in market opportunities, the U.S. Department of Commerce can help prepare them.

Toxic/Hazardous Waste

It appears that toxic/hazardous waste is a very soft market because of the lack of enforcement. Hazardous waste does not have to be characterized in Taiwan as in the U.S. Hazardous waste companies and haulers as well as the marketing of hazardous waste landfills should be considered a prospect in the long term and a low priority.

Municipal Solid Waste

The municipal solid waste market is subject to some controversy. It is a long and arduous process that U.S. companies such as Laidlaw, Rollins, and USPCI understand very well. Although the Japanese were the first to sell BOT/BOO incinerators to Taiwan, public backlash against incomplete combustion-producing dioxins from Japanese technologies may open the door for U.S. firms.

Sludge Treatment

The sludge treatment market is driven more by recovery economics than by regulatory compliance. Probably fewer than 15 U.S. companies could provide recovery services in Taiwan. Internet searches could produce a list of such companies quickly. These companies should ask for a sample analysis of the sludge and the concentration of the target material to be covered. Many U.S. firms can tell immediately if there is a commercial opportunity from the sample analysis alone.

Groundwater and Soil Treatment

The groundwater and soil treatment market is probably four to five years in the future, maybe longer depending on Taiwan's economic condition in upcoming years. In addition, Taiwanese companies will not be receptive to traditional "pump and treat" groundwater treatment technologies that have uncertain effectiveness and unknown termination. We classify this sector as a low priority.

Infrastructure Projects

According to TEPA, investments in the government's Six-Year Plan will total $12 billion. It is estimated that the average annual growth stemming from infrastructure developments will reach 20% for the next 10 years, second to the aerospace industry. The infrastructure program, however, has been beset by delays attributed to bureaucratic hurdles and public opposition. Taiwan relies heavily on nuclear energy, for instance, but the fourth nuclear power plant has created intense political controversy. Meanwhile, public interest groups have led protests against construction of factories viewed as threats to public safety and the environment. The government�s frustration with delays in infrastructure projects has led to efforts to privatize development and operations of incinerators on the island.

The imported environmental equipment market may be much smaller than the infrastructure projects market in total dollar amounts. However, for many small- and medium-sized companies, small equipment sales may be a much more realistic goal than multibillion-dollar infrastructure projects.

FOREIGN COMPETITION

As shown in the following table, the exporting country market share of Taiwan imports has been fairly steady since 1990. Japan continues to be the largest exporter of goods and services to Taiwan with just under $30 billion in exports in 1997, which represents 25% of Taiwan�s total import market. The U.S. is the second largest exporter with a total of $23 billion and a 20% share. With exports of approximately $5 billion each, Germany, Korea, and France are the next largest exporters to Taiwan. After the first four months of 1998, Japanese market share increased by roughly 2.5% (23.35 to 25.93%) while U.S. market share fell approximately 4.5% (22.01 to 17.32%). This data does not constitute a trend but imports should be watched closely.

Share of Imports by Country

Year & Month

Japan

Republic of Korea

France

Germany

U.S

1990

29.24%

2.46%

2.07%

4.96%

23.05%

1991

30.00%

2.78%

1.81%

4.79%

22.45%

1992

30.23%

3.20%

1.95%

5.44%

21.90%

1993

30.09%

3.29%

1.65%

5.48%

21.70%

1994

29.04%

3.53%

1.71%

5.61%

21.14%

1995

29.23%

4.18%

1.72%

5.49%

20.06%

1996

26.86%

4.07%

3.97%

4.91%

19.51%

1997

25.36%

4.39%

4.13%

4.69%

20.31%

1997

 

 

 

 

 

April

25.73%

4.17%

3.39%

4.69%

19.94%

May

24.77%

4.64%

1.85%

5.01%

21.35%

June

26.21%

4.22%

3.24%

4.73%

20.71%

July

25.91%

4.38%

3.63%

4.90%

21.42%

August

24.37%

4.06%

7.38%

4.40%

18.41%

September

26.36%

4.34%

2.27%

4.79%

19.12%

October

26.98%

4.98%

2.01%

4.25%

18.51%

November

24.65%

5.07%

4.33%

4.96%

20.59%

December

24.37%

4.06%

8.12%

4.15%

21.91%

1998

 

 

 

 

 

January

23.35%

4.96%

4.02%

4.53%

22.01%

February

27.65%

4.86%

3.04%

4.17%

22.05%

March

27.05%

5.37%

3.75%

4.53%

19.34%

April

25.93%

5.24%

7.71%

4.52%

17.32%

1998 avg.

25.99%

5.11%

4.63%

4.44%

20.18%

One of the greatest barriers to market entry is rigid competition. In the government sector, market penetration by foreign companies is impeded by stiff competition from large, quasi-government engineering firms and a plethora of mom-and-pop engineering companies with good connections. Apart from the problem of having "prearranged bid winners," the Taiwanese government has placed strict limitations on foreign ownership and operation of facilities. With every success story, there is a trail of firms that have packed up and closed shop.

Environmental Equipment

U.S.-sourced equipment holds a prominent share in environmental equipment sales. Historically, American firms with leading-edge technologies have dominated the public sector, while private firms prefer Japanese companies because of lower prices and more accessible customer service. U.S. providers are generally recognized by Taiwan officials as leaders in environmental technology.

In some types of equipment, such as compressors, coolers, water filters, and filter parts, U.S. firms hold a commanding lead. This lead has been widening in the last two years. In other areas, such as compressor parts, blowers, gas filters, humidifiers, and dehumidifiers, Japan holds a substantial lead. DOC data suggest, however, that American environmental technology has gained an increasing share of the industrial market in recent years due to Taiwan�s efforts to diversify equipment sourcing.

Environmental Equipment Leading Suppliers

U.S.

Japan

Compressors

Compressor Parts

Coolers

Blowers

Water Filters

Gas Filters

Filter Parts

Humidifiers & Dehumidifiers

 

However, the US-Asia Environmental Partnership (US-AEP, Taipei) warns that U.S. suppliers must change the market perception that technology developed and commercialized in U.S. markets is not as suitable for local conditions as technology from Japan. There is also the perception that U.S. equipment providers do not offer reliable follow-up service or local support. Nevertheless, U.S. firms may have the advantage in advanced treatment capabilities as standards are tightened.

"The key to surviving in Taiwan�s competitive environmental markets is a strategic long-term approach.... players must emphasize localization and integration of Taiwan-based capabilities. In general, it is no longer possible to compete through technical superiority and expertise."

The key to surviving in Taiwan�s competitive environmental markets is a strategic long-term approach. Taiwan�s markets are extremely tough and players must emphasize localization and integration of Taiwan-based capabilities. In general, it is no longer possible to compete through technical superiority and expertise. The government has fostered the transfer of technology that has, in some sectors, established reputable domestic players. Without the home field advantage, foreign companies are tackling opponents their own size and competition is price sensitive.

The following chart gives vital statistics on Taiwan�s domestic environmental business sector in 1992 and projections for 2002.

Taiwan's Environmental Business Sector

Indicator

1992

2002 (est.)

Production Value

1,324

3,759

Average Annual Growth

11%

11%

Number of Companies

550

750

Average Production per Company ($millions)

2.4

5.01

Number of Employees

12,000

20,000

Average Production per Employee

110,000

180,000

Exports ($millions)

75

464

Imports ($millions)

384

996

Domestic Demand ($millions)

1,633

4,291

Ratio Domestic to Export Sales

96:6

86:14

R&D as Percent of Total Sales

1%

1%

Professional/Technical Employees as Percent of Total Employees

50%

65%

Source: TEPA

Consulting and Engineering

Taiwan�s export-oriented companies are aware of increasing international trade pressures. Standards such as ISO 14000 and multilateral initiatives have sharpened the focus on environmental solutions. While not a member of the United Nations, Taiwan adheres to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal. There is a growing belief that to be competitive internationally, industry must comply with international standards. Somewhat reluctantly, they are beginning to see the need for environmental consulting and engineering services in this area.

However, industries tend to think that consulting and engineering services should be provided free of charge. These services are typically part of the package to obtain the hardware contract. Nonetheless, this view has not impeded the development of Taiwan�s domestic consulting and engineering sector.

Taiwan�s engineering/construction sector is dominated by large, government-supported entities and multinational engineering firms. Of these, the so-called "Big Five" -- China Technical Consultants (CTCI), RETSER, China Engineering (CECI), BES Engineering, and Sinotech Engineering Consultants, Ltd. -- have the strongest presence in Taiwan and focus mainly on the public sector.

Major Consulting and Engineering Firms in Taiwan

Firm

Staff

BES

4,500

China Engineering

1,705

CTCI

1,556

Sinotech Engineering

1,230

PECL

725

RETSER

450

Moh & Associates

354

Fu-tai Engineering

348

Gibsin Engineers

312

Super Max Engineering

110

Cambridge Engineering

70

Continental Water

N/A

Source: � Asia Environmental Business Journal

Within the last decade, around 350 small, private firms also have emerged, comprising the majority of the Taiwan Environmental Engineering Association. These firms tend to focus on niche areas, such as municipal and industrial wastewater treatment. Large, state-run and private companies have also diversified into the local environmental market. Some foreign firms, mainly U.S. multinationals, have established a presence through representative arrangements. The Ministry of Economic Affairs� Industrial Development Bureau has funded government consulting through the Industrial Technology Research Institute (Taiwan, Hsinchu).

Given the country�s protectionist policies, foreign companies have found it difficult to establish a strong presence in Taiwan. Some regulations require foreign companies to bid as subcontractors, limiting foreign ownership to 30%. As a result, foreign companies are forced into project-specific partnering relationships with local companies where technology cooperation and/or subcontracting roles are expected. In effect, this forces foreign companies into subsidizing the training of local company staff and giving market share away in the long term.

Where domestic technical capabilities do exist, foreign companies are at a disadvantage. For example, Taiwanese engineering companies have been awarded a large majority of the $4.2 billion allocated for construction of the municipal wastewater treatment system, although foreign firms did participate in the planning and basic design phases.

Major U.S. Consulting and Engineering Firms Operating in Taiwan

Firm

Staff

ERM

45

CH2M Hill/OMI

20

ICF Kaiser International

18

Camp Dresser Mckee

15

Montgomery Watson

10

International Technology

N/A

Source: � Asia Environmental Business Journal

Technological advantage is also rapidly diminishing for foreign firms because technology transfer-based relationships with foreign firms have fostered the development of a highly competitive domestic engineering capability. For example, Super Max Engineering Enterprise Co., one of the top Taiwanese consulting and engineering firms, has acquired state-of-the-art technology from Fuji Kasui Engineering of Japan.

Today, foreign companies are playing on relatively equal ground. Competition is based on pricing and contacts. Foreign firms are forced to localize, establish branch offices, or embark on joint ventures with local companies. International Technology Corp. (IT, Torrance, California) recently acquired a 50% stake in $12 million Chi Mei Scientech/Entech, part of the Chi Mei Group, a multinational manufacturing and trading company and the largest privately held firm in Taiwan.

Many foreign firms believe that doing business in Taiwan may provide an entry into China. Taiwan�s economy is closely integrated with Mainland China, and some Taiwanese companies have established representative or branch offices there. IT�s foray into Taiwan, for example, is intended as a platform for future expansion into China and other Asian countries. SuperMax has established offices in Hanzhou, Zeijiang province, and Beijing. On average, the Taiwan-based offices of U.S. environmental firms report that 15�20% of their regional business comes from China. U.S. consulting and engineering players like ICF Kaiser and Camp Dresser & McKee use Taiwan to support regional work.

The Imported Environmental Equipment Market by Country

  • Japan and the U.S. accounted for over 60% of the total environmental equipment import market between 1994 and 1996.
  • In 1997, Germany increased its market share from 6 to 20%�a significant jump.
  • This increase in market share was taken from both the U.S. and the Japanese, which lost 5% and 6% respectively.
Imported Environmental Equipment:  Market Share Composition By Exporting Country (U.S. $1,000)

Source:  China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs Import Monthly

 

Loss of U.S. Market Share

"The U.S. has lost market share to Japan, Germany, the UK, Italy, South Korea, and even to Mainland China. While these market shares represent small absolute dollar amounts, the trends are nevertheless reason for concern for the U.S. environmental industry."

As the following table shows, U.S. environmental equipment exports to Taiwan have been declining since 1995, although the total market has been increasing. The U.S. has lost market share to Japan, Germany, the UK, Italy, South Korea, and even to Mainland China. While these market shares represent small absolute dollar amounts, the trends are nevertheless reason for concern for the U.S. environmental industry. These numbers are not estimates, but actual sums of equipment orders passing through Taiwan customs.

Imported Environmental Equipment:  Market Share Growth By Exporting Country (U.S. $1,000)

Source:  China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs Import Monthly Statistics

 

The U.S. seems to be losing market share in a traditionally strong market for U.S. companies. Germany increased its environmental equipment sales to Taiwan by $65 million between 1996 and 1997. As shown in the table below, $12 million in German sales came from the water treatment equipment segment. During the same period, the U.S. only lost $1 million in sales, but gave up 14% of the total market share. We highly recommend an investigation into which German companies are increasing their sales and why, which customers are switching suppliers, and which specific U.S. technologies are losing ground.

Water Treatment Equipment by Exporting Country (U.S. $1,000)

Source:  China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs Import Monthly Statistics

 

Pollution prevention equipment is broadly defined by the Taiwan government as a combination of "end-of-pipe" technologies and some process-modification equipment. As shown in the table below, this segment recovered in 1997. However, the U.S. lost market dominance. Germany again took market share away from both Japan and the U.S.

Pollution Prevention Equipment By Exporting Country (U.S. $1,000)


Source:  China External Trade Development Council, ROC Customs Import Monthly Statistics

 

REGULATORY IMPACT

In 1992, the government launched a six-year "Green Plan" for a healthy environment. The plan proposed 19 measures, including financial incentives to encourage private firms to install environmentally beneficial systems and develop environmental technologies to build up domestic capability. Goals and objectives for four areas of environmental protection are listed below.

Environmental Protection in the Six-Year Development Plan

Solid Waste Management

Goal
  • Raise the rate of proper garbage treatment to 85% and garbage incineration to 50%.
  • Privatize 25% of the construction of large-scale garbage incinerators.
Plan
  • Build 21 garbage incinerators. After completion, daily garbage incineration will be over 17,000 tons.
  • Build 23 district landfills, 55 general landfills.
  • Improve clearance and transportation equipment.
  • Practice garbage classification and recycling.

Industrial Waste Treatment

Goal
  • Treat 45% of industrial waste, whose value is about 6.8 million tons per year.
  • Treat 45% of medical waste, whose volume is about 35,000 tons per year.
  • Treat 40% of construction waste earth, whose volume is about 56 million cubic meters per year.
Plan
  • Construct a model incinerator [Republic of China Environmental Protection Agency (ROC EPA)]. Industrial waste centers will be built in the north, center, and south of the island. Private treatment plants are also encouraged.
  • Assist individual hospitals in establishing hospital waste incineration co-treatment centers (The National Health Administrator of ROC).
  • Assist local governments in planning and constructing waste earth disposal ground (The Ministry of Interior).
  • Promote the reduction of industrial waste.

Water Pollution Prevention

Goal
  • Complete clean-up plan of 44 rivers and the cleanup for 10 other seriously polluted rivers.
  • Reduce industrial waste pollution by 76%, farming wastewater by 73%, and household wastewater by 27%.
Plan
  • Clean up the Tamsui River with a total budget of $1.5 billion.
  • Enlist 16,000 pollution-causing businesses, including factories, mineral fields, pig farms, hospitals, schools, and tourist hotels to encourage their controls.
  • Initiate clean-up programs for Keelung, Taichung, and Kaohsiung harbors.

Air Pollution Control

Goal
  • Reduce the amount of harmful air pollution index (PSI>100) during the day to 10% for the northern, 5% for the central, and 0% for the eastern district of the island.
Plan
  • Gradually tighten emission standards for automobiles, motorcycles, and diesel trucks.
  • Reinforce the supply of low-pollution fuel.
  • Strengthen the auditing of factories regarding emissions.
  • Expand the island-wide air quality monitoring station network.
  • Reduce CFC consumption, leading to an entire ban by 1995.
Source: Taiwan EPA (TEPA)

Environmental Agencies

TEPA institutes regulations and policies, relying on established models, such as the U.S. EPA's regulatory framework. For example, industrial solid waste regulations are modeled after the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, incorporating the "cradle-to-grave" philosophy. Hazardous waste and air pollution control policies also follow the U.S. example. TEPA�s administrative partner is the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB), which provides technical assistance and financial incentives aimed at bringing industry into compliance.

Local Government Focus

Taiwan Environmental Protection (TEPA)

Sector Priority:
  • Municipal solid waste
  • Industrial waste
  • Municipal wastewater
  • Air pollution
Key Issues:
  • Private sector involvement
  • Recycling framework
  • Medical waste
  • Hazardous waste treatment
  • Sewage system development
  • Industrial point source

Industrial Development Bureau (IDA)

Sector Priority:
  • Industrial solid waste
  • Industrial wastewater
  • Air pollution
  • Air toxics/VOCs
Key Issues:
  • Hospitals/Medical facilities
  • Petrochemical industry
  • Chemical industry
  • Nonwoven fiber production
  • Dyeing industry
  • Petroleum refining
  • Paper and pulp industry
  • Food processing
  • Metal finishing
  • Electroplating
  • Surface coating
  • Electronics
  • Slaughtering/Animal husbandry
  • Iron and steel
  • Power plants
  • Cement
  • Printing
  • Dry cleaning
Source: US-Asia Environmental Partnership (US-AEP)

The Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) implements regulatory programs within each county and municipality of Taipei and Kaohsiung. The Environmental Protection Department (EPD) supervises EPB. The municipal governments of Taipei and Kaohsiung have their own EPDs.

Environmental Legislation

Taiwan's environmental legislation focuses on four main "P" principles: polluter pays, public participation, privatization, and pollution prevention.

Major Environmental Laws and Amendments

  • Air Pollution Control Act (February 1993)
  • Water Pollution Control Act (May 1991)
  • Solid Waste Disposal Act (May 1989)
  • Toxic Chemical Control Act (November 1988)
  • Noise Control Act (February 1992)

 

TEPA promulgated a new definition of waste that dramatically increased the types of wastes defined as hazardous. It also began implementing an air emissions permitting program and the industrial wastewater monitoring and self-reporting system, and promulgated VOC emission standards for the automotive and coatings industry. In the process of adopting regulations, however, TEPA has also underestimated the need to "localize" many U.S.-based regulations. 

Environmental Budgets

After overestimating its resource allocations at $36 billion for environmental spending, the government was forced to reduce its spending plan for 1992�1997 to $12 billion. Of the total, about 80% will come from government and state-owned firms. The private sector is expected to lag behind until enforcement begins in 1996, accounting for the longer term market potential. The bulk of expenditures will be on municipal solid waste and municipal wastewater.

Environmental Awareness

As a by-product of the democratization process in government, public participation in environmental issues has gained momentum. The "not in my back yard" (NIMBY) syndrome has developed in Taiwan, raising compliance levels among industry. The push from nongovernmental organizations has had some success in rousing popular interest among the emerging educated and affluent middle class.

However, public interest in the environment has also backfired, delaying some badly needed environmental infrastructure. Consequently, many public sector-financed projects have not progressed to the construction stage as anticipated. These projects included waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration plants and integrated industrial/hazardous waste treatment facilities.

Enforcement

The link between regulation and demand for environmental technologies is enforcement, which will improve with the maturation of TEPA and implementation of wastewater, air permitting, and reporting systems. In short, the screws on industry are being tightened, albeit slowly, and many local industries are beginning to respond.

Soil and groundwater remediation became an issue in 1995, not because of specific regulations (there are only minimal laws in this area) but as an offshoot of a political scandal that occurred in the run-up to the 1994 election. A developer tried to rezone a large parcel of industrial land for commercial and residential use. A former EPA administrator running for mayor of Taipei revealed that the site contained contaminated soil and groundwater. Thereafter, the government restricted the rezoning of any industrial land without an environmental impact assessment. This policy has resulted in new interest by local industry in site assessments and remediation.

Enforcement, however, is limited by trained manpower shortages, lack of administrative systems, and political lethargy. Taiwan�s industry is still partially state owned, and the government controls most of the heavy industries sector. Because the government is directly intertwined with industry, compliance is not always a factor as a market driver. For example, the state-run petrochemical company has invested heavily in the cleanup of soil and groundwater contamination although TEPA has yet to promulgate relevant regulations.

Although the total number of citations and fines levied has not changed significantly since 1990, the number of inspections has grown considerably. If increased inspection rates are a precursor to greater penalties in the future, we can expect polluters to increase their investments in environmental technologies.

Environmental Enforcement By Media, 1990-1998

 

It is difficult to get the many small and medium-sized manufacturers to comply with environmental regulations. To counter this, local governments are seeking greater control over environmental project implementation and regulatory enforcement.

 

 

HOME | ABOUT | SERVICES | NEWS & PUBS | CONTACTS | CONFERENCESSITEMAP | SEARCH | LINKS | INSIDE US-AEP
United States-Asia Environmental Partnership, 1819 H Street NW, 7th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: 202-835-0333 Fax: 202-835-0366 E-mail: