export
markets
country
comparisons
helpful
hints
export
links
site
map
Back to Export Advisor
Philippines

Philippines:  Environmental Market Analysis

COUNTRY OVERVIEW

The Philippine economy has turned the corner on the Asian financial crisis and is experiencing modest growth. The recovery has been led by the agricultural sector's bounce back from 1998's losses and merchandise trade. U.S. exports to the Philippines, which represented nearly 23% of total Philippine imports in 1998 (replacing Japan as the number one exporter to the Philippines), are projected to increase slightly in 1999.

The Philippines' GDP growth in 1999 is expected to reach 1.8 to 2.5 percent as the country recovers from the Asian economic crisis. In 1998, the Philippines had the highest export growth in Asia, led by the electronics, auto parts, and furniture industries.

Leading U.S. export markets over the near-term continue to be telecommunications equipment, information technology, power plant equipment and services, food processing equipment, hotel and restaurant equipment, and agricultural products. Sectors offering the greatest investment potential for U.S. firms are electronics/semiconductor assembly, energy, and information technology.

The environmental market, including environmental infrastructure projects in the pipeline, is estimated to be about $4 billion and is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 17% from 1999 to 2003.

Improved enforcement of environmental regulations is expected as a result of the upgrade of the Environmental Management Bureau of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to a line agency. It will have more funds and will establish regional offices with an increase in staff from 170 to 2,350 nationwide.

MARKET ESTIMATES AND ANALYSIS

Target Industries

Between 1997 and the first quarter of 1998, nine of the country�s 16 major sectors experienced a decrease in the value of production, resulting in a 2% decrease overall. Among the losers were transport equipment, basic metals, petroleum products, and textiles. Gainers included apparel, electrical machinery, and food manufacturing.  Based on production volume, these are the industries that U.S. environmental companies should primarily target.

For 2000, US-AEP is focussing its trade lead generation on the electronics industry (represents over 50% of exports and contributes substantially to water pollution and toxic waste), the food beverage industry (has a growing economic base and the largest number of cease and desist orders of any other industry), and the automotive industry.

Value of the Production Index 1998

Industry

April Growth (%)

March Growth (%)

Gainers

 

 

Food Manufacturing

18.1

28.7

Electrical Machinery

27.3

43.6

Wearing Apparel

36.8

43.1

Paper and Paper Products

8.8

44.6

Chemicals

1.9

18.0

Miscellaneous Manufactures

22.1

21.8

Furniture and Fixtures

5.5

31.7

Losers

 

Basic Metals

-36.0

-18.9

Petroleum Products

-12.8

- 3.7

Transport Equipment

-38.0

-40.3

Textile

-16.9

8.9

Nonmetallic Mineral Products

-15.3

-6.5

Beverage

-21.4

20.6

Wood and Wood Product

- 5.3

11.0

Rubber Products

- 7.3

7.3

Tobacco

- 4.9

36.0

 

Monthly statistics of production volume for 1998 shown in the table below provide some interesting, albeit worrisome, information: during the first quarter of 1998, all the major sectors posted monthly declines. Basic metals registered the largest drop of 34.7%. Textiles (-26.4%), food manufacturing (-4.8%), and petroleum refineries (-4.5%) also contributed significantly to that downward pull.

Value of the Production Index 1998

Industry

April

March

Basic Metals

-34.3

-19.9

Textile

-26.3

4.6

Food Manufacturing

- 5.9

12.7

Petroleum Products

- 5.2

- 0.2

Chemicals

- 9.5

8.3

Wood and Wood Products

-15.1

1.1

Paper and Paper Products

-12.4

13.1

Beverage

-17.9

17.7

Electrical Machinery

- 3.1

- 5.0

Nonmetallic Mineral Products

- 4.7

7.9

Rubber Products

- 9.3

6.1

Wearing Apparel

- 2.0

- 5.8

Transport Equipment

- 1.1

-10.9

Furniture and Fixtures

- 7.0

5.0

Tobacco

- 9.6

18.9

Miscellaneous

- 2.7

9.6

 

More than 50 percent of Philippine exports are from the electronics and semiconductor industry.  this means that there is a big market for environmental goods and services in this sector.  Other sectors like the food processing industry,chemical and petrochemicals, and textile manufacturers, cement industries, power plants, rubber products, and nonmetallic mineral products account for more than 50 percent of the environmental market.

Pollution Control

According to the 2000 U.S. Department of Commerce reporting estimates, the Pollution Control Equipment sector ranks tenth among leading industry sectors for U.S. exports and investment for non-agricultural goods and services in Philippines.

American pollution control and monitoring equipment continue to dominate the local market. However, there was a tremendous decline in imports in 1998 as a result of the financial crisis. The environmental market shrank considerably with the market for pollution control equipment and services down by 25-35 percent. It is expected that the environmental market will register a 10-15 percent growth in 1999.

Laguna Lake Development Authority�s (LLDA) implementation of the polluter pay system (beginning in 1997) has forced some companies to install wastewater treatment facilities. In May 1999, LLDA also implemented a new regulation requiring all industrial estates to put up common waste treatment facilities. Based on the success of the LLDA�s implementation, DENR will implement the "polluter pay system" in the whole Metro Manila area and eventually in other cities and provinces.

The air pollution control and monitoring equipment import market is expected to pick up this year. The Clean Air Act has been passed into law and the Asian Development Bank is funding the USD 298 million Metro Manila Air Quality Improvement Project. DENR is implementing this three-year Air Quality Action Plan to tackle Metro Manila�s deteriorating air quality. This project offers opportunities for both stationary and mobile air pollution control equipment vendors.

The following table depicts the total market size as well as the amount of imports from the U.S. for pollution control equipment and services.

Pollution Control Equipment (millions of US$)

Indicator

1997

1998

1999(E)

Total Market Size

112

84

95

Total Local Production

NA

NA

NA

Total Exports

19

8

10

Total Imports

131

92

105

Total Imports from U.S.

37

23

26

Source:  USDOC, International Trade Commission, July 1999

 

Water Resource Equipment/Services ($ millions)

Indicator

1997

1998

1999

Total Market Size

119

73

83

Total Local Production

26

30

35

Total Exports

22

26

32

Total Imports

115

70

80

Total Imports from U.S.

27

16

18

Note: Only 1997 import and export statistics are official figures; other statistics are unofficial estimates.
Source: 1999 Country Commercial Guide, U.S. Department of Commerce

 

In the area of industrial wastewater, there is also demand for parts of filtering and purifying machinery and apparati for liquids.

Parts in Demand for Industrial Wastewater Operations

  • ozonators
  • reverse osmosis facilities and equipment
  • water filtration plants
  • filter cartridges
  • water purification equipment
  • water aerators and other filters
  • parts of steam and other vapor generating boilers such as vapor sprays, atomizers, boiler systems, pipes and fittings.

 

Best Market Prospects for Industrial Wastewater
  • water recycling systems
  • drilling equipment and accessories
  • slurry pumps
  • water softeners
  • economizers
  • boiling and cooling towers
  • heat recovery steam generators
  • desalination equipment

 

Best Market Prospects for Air Pollution-related Problems
  • flue gas desulfurization and denitrifying plants
  • electrostatic precipitators
  • air scrubbers
  • baghouses
  • catalytic converters

 

In the area of imported equipment, the following U.S. developers and engineering firms are major players.

Major U.S. Developers and Engineering Firms
Exporting Equipment to the Philippines

  • Fluor Daniel
  • Ogden Yorkshire
  • Envitech
  • Bechtel
  • Brown & Root
  • Parsons
  • Metcalf  & Eddy
  • Dames & Moore
  • Woodward Clyde
  • Operations Management International, Inc.

Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment

The market for the water supply and wastewater treatment equipment continues to offer opportunities for U.S. suppliers and service firms. Although 1998 reflected a 20 percent decline in imports, the market should recover because of the many water and wastewater infrastructure projects scheduled for implementation in 1999. Based on the local preference for imported equipment, U.S. imports should grow 10-15 percent in 1999-2000.

The following table depicts the total market size as well as the amount of imports from the U.S. for water resource equipment and services.

 

Indicator

1997

1998

1999

Total Market Size

119

103

115

Total Local Production

26

28

30

Total Exports

22

18

20

Total Imports

115

93

105

Total Imports from U.S.

27

23

105

Source: USDOC, International Trade Commission, July 1999

Multilateral agencies such as the World Bank (WB) and Asian Development Bank (ADB) have several loans lined up for water supply and wastewater treatment related projects.

Multilateral Agencies Funding Government Projects Related to the Environment

  • Asian Development Bank
  • Overseas Economic Cooperation Fund of Japan
  • United Nations Agencies
  • World Bank

 

World Bank-funded Projects
  • $76 million to the metro Manilla Second Sewerage Project of Maynilad Water Services Inc.,  1998-2000
  • $57 million to the Water Districts Development Project 1 of the Local Water Utilities Administration and Land Bank and the Local Government Units (LGUs) of Davao, Cagayan de Oro, Calamba, and Cotabato cities, 1999
  • $60 million to the Subic Freeport Project Phase II of Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority,   1998-2000
  • An estimated $30 million to the Local Government Unit Urban Water and Sanitation project to be implemented by the Department of Interior and Local Government and LGUs,   1999-2001

 

Asian Development Bank-funded Projects

  • a Water and Sanitation Sector Study that will identify priority projects for local governmentunits estimated to be worth $57 million, 1999�2004
  • the Pasig River Rehabilitation Project and the Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector II. These projects will provide equipment procurement and consulting service opportunities for U.S. firms.

 

Projects Most Likely to Offer Business Opportunities to U.S. Firms

  • The Pasig River Rehabilitation Project and the Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector II project will provide equipment procurement and consulting service opportunities
  • The Bulacan Water Project II, Cavite Water Supply, Batangas City Water Supply, and Laiban Dam Project are potential opportunities for U.S. firms under the Build Operate Transfer (BOT) scheme.
  • Private developers of Fort Bonifacio Global City and Smokey Mountain-Harbor City are seeking joint venture partners for their wastewater treatment facilities.

Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

The onset of the regional financial crisis in July 1997 brought many changes to the fortunes of manufacturing firms. Figure 16 shows manufacturing revenue growth rates for several months prior to the end of July 1997 through July 1998. Figure 16 illustrates how unequally the manufacturing sector absorbed the negative effects of the crisis. The economic impacts felt by industrial groups can greatly influence their interest in or ability to purchase imported goods. This has significant implications for the marketing efforts of U.S. environmental industry exporters and export-promotion agencies and programs that assist them.

The following table also shows that the average monthly manufacturing sector growth rates declined significantly from 2.9% before August 1997 to 1% in the months since. Those declines have been uneven across industry groups, and some industry groups have shown increased growth rates. The wide variation is likely due, at least in part, to the level of import or export dependency of a particular industry, as well as the geographic focus of those imports and exports.

Industrial Growth Before and During the Asian Currency Crisis

Major Industrial Groups

Average Monthly Percent Revenue Growth for Seven Months Prior to August 1997

Average Monthly Percent Revenue Growth from August 1997 through July 1998

Total Manufacturing

3.2%

-0.1%

Food Manufacturing

-3.4%

3.3%

Beverage

1.4%

0.4%

Tobacco

3.4%

0.3%

Textile

2.6%

1.5%

Wearing Apparel

4.1%

1.9%

Wood and Wood Products

1.3%

6.2%

Furniture and Fixtures

1.2%

1.8%

Paper and Paper Products

0.8%

1.5%

Chemicals

1.6%

-0.9%

Rubber Products

11.4%

0.3%

Petroleum Products

0.4%

1.1%

Nonmetallic Mineral Products

0.7%

1.0%

Basic Metals

1.7%

0.2%

Transport Equipment

10.5%

-3.8%

Electrical Machinery

4.8%

3.7%

Miscellaneous Manufacturers

3.3%

-1.7%

Total Manufacturing

2.9%

1.0%

Source: Monthly Integrated Survey of Selected Industries (MISSI), Economic Analysis Division, Industry and Trade Statistics Department, National Statistics Office, Republic of the Philippines.

 

The next figure ranks manufacturing industry groups according to their pre-crisis average monthly growth rates. With the exception of food manufacturing, all showed positive average growth in the months leading up to the crisis; only three others showed average monthly growth rates at or below 1%.

Fastest Growing Industries Before the Asian Currency Crisis

Fastest Growing Industries

Rank

Average Monthly Percent Revenue Growth for Seven Months Prior to August 1997

Rubber Products

1

11.4%

Transport Equipment

2

10.5%

Electrical Machinery

3

4.8%

Wearing Apparel

4

4.1%

Tobacco

5

3.4%

Miscellaneous Manufacturers

6

3.3%

Textile

7

2.6%

Basic Metals

8

1.7%

Chemicals

9

1.6%

Beverage

10

1.4%

Wood and Wood Products

11

1.3%

Furniture and Fixtures

12

1.2%

Paper and Paper Products

13

0.8%

Nonmetallic Mineral Products

14

0.7%

Petroleum Products

15

0.4%

Food Manufacturing

16

-3.4%

Source: Monthly Integrated Survey of Selected Industries (MISSI), Economic Analysis Division, Industry and Trade Statistics Department, National Statistics Office, Republic of the Philippines.

In contrast, the following figure shows negative growth rates during the currency crisis for three industries (excluding food manufacturing) and growth at or below 1% for as many as eight. This figure also contrasts pre-crisis and in-crisis average growth rankings. Clearly, some potential buyers of imported environmental goods and services are less able to make purchases while some less likely buyers are more equipped to spend money.

Fastest Growing Industries Since the Onset of the Asian Currency Crisis

Fastest Growing Industries

Rank

Pre-Crisis
Rank

Average Monthly Percent Revenue Growth (August 1997�July 1998)

Wood and Wood Products

1

11

6.2%

Electrical Machinery

2

3

3.7%

Food Manufacturing

3

16

3.3%

Wearing Apparel

4

4

1.9%

Furniture and Fixtures

5

12

1.8%

Paper and Paper Products

6

13

1.5%

Textile

7

7

1.5%

Petroleum Products

8

15

1.1%

Nonmetallic Mineral Products

9

14

1.0%

Beverage

10

10

0.4%

Tobacco

11

5

0.3%

Rubber Products

12

1

0.3%

Basic Metals

13

8

0.2%

Chemicals

14

9

-0.9%

Miscellaneous Manufacturers

15

6

-1.7%

Transport Equipment

16

2

-3.8%

Source: Monthly Integrated Survey of Selected Industries (MISSI), Economic Analysis Division, Industry and Trade Statistics Department, National Statistics Office, Republic of the Philippines.

 

The following table provides comparative environmental market size estimates for 1995 and 1997 prepared by the Department of Commerce and California-based Environmental Business International, Inc. (EBI). All but one estimate (U.S. Department of Commerce) excludes revenues from water and wastewater utilities.

Comparative Estimates of Environmental Markets in the Philippines ($ millions)

Market Segment

EBI
1995

USDOC
1995

EBI
1997

USDOC
1997

Water Supply and Distribution

210

60

251*

75

Wastewater Treatment

NA

70

100

100

Air Pollution Control

20

20

10

10

Hazardous Waste Management

3

20

15

15

Solid Waste Management

61

110

100

100

Medical Waste Management

NA

NA

10

10

Monitoring/Analytical Equipment

10

17

25

25

Consulting/Engineering Services

42

30

36

35

Total

346

327

547*

370

Note: Only 1997 import and export statistics are official figures; other statistics are unofficial estimates.
Source: 1999 Country Commercial Guide, U.S. Department of Commerce

 

FOREIGN COMPETITION

The market for environmental technologies and services is in an early stage of growth. While there is a growing domestic capability in wastewater treatment and other environmental equipment areas, the quality of locally produced equipment needs much improvement. There are substantial opportunities for foreign companies.

"While there is a growing domestic capability in wastewater treatment and other environmental equipment areas, the quality of locally produced equipment needs much improvement. There are substantial opportunities here for foreign companies."

Imports still account for the bulk of market demand in environmental segments. U.S. and Japanese suppliers generally lead in environmental markets. U.S.-produced water/wastewater treatment equipment accounted for 39% of imports in 1993. Singapore followed with 30%, Japan with 8%, and China with 4%. American firms trailed behind Japanese suppliers in air pollution control equipment imports in 1992, but crept to the top in 1993 as supplies from Japan declined.

In Consulting & Engineering services, there is growing expertise among domestic consultants, particularly in environmental impact assessments, natural resources, air pollution control, solid waste management, and biodiversity studies. Although local expertise is still being developed in most other areas, such as GIS and risk assessments, Philippine consultants meet almost all local industry demand. However, foreign expertise is usually demanded by multilateral funding agencies for services valued beyond $250,000, although teaming or partnering with local consultants is the modus operandi under multilateral contracting procedures.

Major U.S. Players in Environmental Services
  • Woodward Clyde
  • Dames and Moore
  • Metcalf and Eddy
  • Weston International
  • Louis Berger International
  • Hagler Bailley Services, Inc.
  • Tetra Tech EM, Inc.
  • Ecology & Environment, Inc

 

U.S. Equipment Suppliers

  • Brunner Corporation
  • Yeoman Chicago Corporation
  • Cromaglass Corporation
  • Hach Company
  • Hydrocal Systems, Inc.
  • Wastewater Treatment Systems, Inc.
  • Air Instruments & Measurements, Inc.

 

As shown in the figure below, the exporting countries� share of the Philippines� import market has been fairly stable for the last three years. In 1997, Japan was the largest exporter of goods and services to the Philippines, with approximately $7.4 billion worth of goods and services, capturing 20.6% of the country�s total import market. The U.S. followed closely behind, selling approximately $7.1 billion worth of goods and services, representing 19.9% of total import market. With exports of approximately $2.2 billion each, the Republic of Korea and Singapore were the next largest exporters to the Philippines. Korea and Singapore led Taiwan and Hong Kong.

During the first five months of 1998, the U.S. became the top exporter to the Philippines, surpassing Japan. Compared to the first five months of 1997, the U.S. increased its share by 3.34%, while Japan lost 10%.

The reasons behind this trend warrant further investigation, especially since the Philippine peso depreciated roughly 36% against the U.S. dollar, which certainly raised the cost of U.S. imports. Recent depreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar (roughly 57% over the last 12 months) has inflated the cost of U.S. products and could price them out of the market if this trend continues. Against the Japanese yen, on the other hand, the peso has depreciated by 31%, possibly making Japanese environmental equipment a more economical choice.

Major Trading Partners of the Philippines 1996 to 1997

Country

1996

1997

Percent Share

Jan�May 1998

Percent Share

Percent Growth
in Market Share

Total Imports

32,426.93

35,935.67

100.00

13,118.00

100.00

100.00

Japan

7,128.96

7,409.63

20.62

2,697.19

20.56

- 0.3

U.S.

6,362.32

7,152.91

19.90

2,996.17

22.84

+ 14.77

Korea, Republic of

1,673.25

2,181.51

6.07

914.56

6.97

+ 14.8

Singapore

1,740.39

2,171.13

6.04

812.93

6.20

+ 2.65

Taiwan

1,598.09

1,807.79

5.03

639.16

4.87

- 3.18

Hong Kong

1,360.11

1,549.74

4.31

539.03

4.11

- 4.64

Australia

808.46

954.82

2.66

N/A

N/A

N/A

Malaysia

800.55

947.07

2.64

399.53

3.05

+ 15.53

Indonesia

645.31

704.18

1.96

N/A

N/A

N/A

Germany

1,209.26

1,179.88

3.28

412.74

3.15

- 3.96

Others

9,100.23

9,877.01

27.49

3,020.27

23.02

- 16.26

 

REGULATORY IMPACT

The link between regulation and demand for environmental technologies is enforcement of regulatory programs.  Comprehensive regulations for environmental protection do exist; however, enforcement of national programs is relatively weak.

Government officials show an awareness of the economic importance of better resource management through initiatives set by the Philippine Strategy for Sustainable Development and their response to Agenda 21. The Philippine Strategy consists of nearly 127 projects, but only eight of these, at a cost of  $12.3 million, targeted industrial pollution.

There are many impediments to enforcement of environmental regulations.  The dire need for foreign investment acts is a deterrent, as is corruption on the local level, which remains endemic. Pollution fines at their present levels provide no disincentives for polluters. Likewise, no incentives are provided to those firms that pollute less or manage waste better. Of 1,025 industries surveyed by the Environmental Management Bureau of DENR, only 20% were equipped with pollution abatement systems. Up to 80% of pollution complaints were water-related.

The country has strong nongovernmental organizations focused on environmental issues, but until recently, much of the emphasis has been on natural resource conservation such as forest management. Awareness of air, water, and soil pollution risks is lacking. This is a primary barrier to effective enforcement.

In the Philippines, regulatory enforcement generally follows the principle of crisis management. The following pie chart illustrates the distribution of active enforcement cases by media type in 1996.

Active Enforcement Cases by Media (March 1997)

Source: DENR, Environmental Management Board, March 1997.

Most agencies with enforcement authority, especially on the local and regional levels, do not have the budgets or manpower to institute regular monitoring, inspections, and detailed recordkeeping. Despite these limitations, certain agencies have made real progress in enforcement of environmental laws and regulations over the last two years. Among DENR regional offices, for example, the National Capital Region has been very active in issuance of Cease and Desist Orders for a wide range of industries, accounting for 39 of 79 orders issued in 1996. (Cease and Desist Orders are issued by the Pollution Adjudication Board at the request of DENR regional offices.)

This number can be attributed partly to the fact that Metro Manila remains the primary hub of economic activity in the Philippines. According to the Asian Development Bank (1996), this area accounts for 70% of all industrial establishments, 48% of the total registered businesses, and 56% of the country�s construction industry.  Of the 79 firms that received Cease and Desist Orders, the food processing industry and the sugar milling and refining industry had the most offenses.

Number of Firms with Cease and Desist Orders and/or Temporary Lifting Orders
by the Pollution Adjudication Board in 1996 by Industry

Industry Category

No. of Firms

Food Processing*

10

Sugar Milling and Refining

9

Distilling

4

Mining

4

Paints and Pigments

4

Textile Mill

4

Coconut Oil Refining

3

Fish Canning*

3

Paper Milling, Paperboard

3

Cord, Twine Manufacture

2

Dry Cleaning/Steam Laundry

2

Hotel

2

Industrial Gases

2

Meat Processing*

2

Restaurant

2

Agroprocessing*

1

Chemicals

1

Coconut Processing*

1

Fertilizer Manufacture

1

Glass and Glass Products

1

Metal Finishing

1

Pig Farm

1

Plastics, Plastic Products

1

Soap, Detergent

1

Soy Sauce Manufacture

1

Wood Furniture Manufacture

1

Wood Products/Processing

1

Miscellaneous

10

Total

78

*By grouping fish canning, meat processing, agroprocessing, and coconut
processing with food processing,  the combined number of firms totals 17.
Source: DENR, Environmental Management Board, March 1997.

 

Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Since January 1997, Laguna Lake Development Authority�s (LLDA) implementation of a polluter pays system, known as the "Environmental User�s Fee," has forced some companies to install wastewater treatment facilities. More than half of the 15,000 existing manufacturing facilities in Metro Manila openly pollute and empty discharge into waterways (Manila Bay, Laguna de Bay, Pasig River, and the 21 tributary rivers of Laguna Lake). Based on the success of LLDA�s implementation, DENR will implement the polluter pays system in the whole Metro Manila area and eventually in other cities and provinces nationwide.

The Philippine Department Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) is at the center of the Philippine environmental regulatory and enforcement framework. DENR oversees conservation, management, development, and proper use of the country�s environmental and natural resources. DENR lacks manpower, financial resources, laboratory facilities, and equipment to effectively monitor pollution and punish violators. Despite these shortfalls, DENR has undertaken several antipollution initiatives. In 1990, the agency cracked down on industrial polluters by launching a "Dirty Dozen" campaign, which disclosed the names of the 12 largest polluters in each region. These industries were primarily sugar milling and refining, cement, lime and plaster, mining, piggeries, and poultry farms. Additionally, the powers of the Pollution Adjudication Board were expanded to close polluting plants.

In 1993, DENR proposed measures through 1998 such as reducing vehicle and industrial emissions, supporting local governments in solid waste management, promoting pollution management audits, and increasing penalties. These measures also addressed infrastructure developments related to environmental impact assessments.

Environmental Impact Assessment

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) system was established in 1978, designating the EMB and the regional offices of DENR as the primary implementing agencies. Projects involving heavy industry, resource extraction, and large-scale development as well as projects in environmentally critical areas require an EIA.

EIA implementation has been slow and uneven due in part to the various institutional weaknesses and the underlying emphasis on economic development. In 1996, in the wake of the Marcopper Mining Company�s copper tailings spill on Marinduque Island, EIA approvals were delayed. A few proposed projects ran into delays because the government turned down their planning permits.

Analysis of the Regulatory System

A discussion of the major environmental regulations in the Philippines follows.

Regulations

Major environmental regulations address the following areas:

The effectiveness of the current regulatory system for environmental issues is diminished by the absence of priorities for environmental management, unenforceable policies, and weak institutions.

Priorities

There are no clear priorities established for environmental management; existing structures often send conflicting signals or fail to address environmental problems in proportion to the environmental significance of the problem. Pollutants are strictly regulated, even when the costs of regulation are high and the pollutants are not significant problems for either health or productivity. Pollutants that do pose significant health hazards are not strictly addressed, although cost-effective technical means and policies are available to reduce their ambient levels.

Policies

Policy and regulatory instruments are unenforceable and would not be cost effective with better enforcement. This lack of cost-effectiveness arises from policies that ignore the nature of the pollution problems those policies address, conflicting signals between pricing policies and pollution control regulations, the use of regulatory methods that are costly to administer, and differences in compliance costs for different sources of pollution.

Institutions

The current institutional framework is hampered by numerous constraints and itself poses a threat to economic growth and sustainable development in the Philippines.

Click here to open the Environmental Market Analysis Addendum for the Philippines.

 

 

HOME | ABOUT | SERVICES | NEWS & PUBS | CONTACTS | CONFERENCESSITEMAP | SEARCH | LINKS | INSIDE US-AEP
United States-Asia Environmental Partnership, 1819 H Street NW, 7th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: 202-835-0333 Fax: 202-835-0366 E-mail: