The Second Regional Workshop on Achieving Internationally
Recognized ISO 14000 Accreditation Systems was implemented in Taipei,
Taiwan, R.O.C. March 1-4, 1999. The workshop was jointly sponsored by
the United States-Asia Environmental Partnership�s Clean Technology
and Environmental Management Program (US-AEP/CTEM) and the Chinese
National Accreditation Board (CNAB). It was attended by
representatives of accreditation bodies from nine US-AEP partner
economies: India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan
R.O.C., Thailand, and Vietnam.
The workshop is the second in a series of events focused on
assisting accreditation bodies to achieve internationally recognized
national accreditation systems for environmental management systems
(ISO 14001). The ISO 14001 EMS standard provides a common platform for
industries throughout the world to engage in sound and sustainable
environmental management practices. The establishment of
internationally recognized accreditation systems will provide an
institutional framework for EMS certifications to be recognized across
national boundaries, contributing to the maintenance of high
environmental management standards and facilitating trade.
An initial workshop was held in June 1998 in San Francisco, which
established a common understanding of issues and requirements for
international recognition; provided a forum for the review and
discussion of issues and problems facing accreditation bodies in
achieving international recognition; and formulated a joint Action
Plan that will chart a course to achieve international
recognition, with US-AEP support. The Action Plan identified a
six-stage process for achieving international recognition of national
ISO 14001 accreditation systems.
The Second Workshop in Taipei was held to: (i) clarify and discuss
the status of international recognition process as it has evolved
since the June 1998 workshop; (ii) present, discuss and refine
individual action plans to achieve international recognition; and
(iii) develop an agreed plan of activities for mutual assistance and
support by US-AEP/CTEM. Prior to the Second Workshop, delegates were
provided with a Preparatory Document, designed to assist in the
drafting of the individual action plans.
The workshop included presentations and in-depth discussions with
international guest speakers, including Mr. John Donaldson, Vice
President for Conformity Assessment, American National Standards
Institute (ANSI), and Chairman, Conformity Assessment Committee
(CASCO) of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO);
Mr. Michael Ross, President, EMS, U.S. Registrar Accreditation Board (RAB);
Dr. Young Ku, Professor of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan
University of Science and Technology; and Mr. Klaus Ziegler, SGS
International Certification Services, Taiwan, R.O.C.
The Workshop�s review of the current status of the international
recognition process for EMS through the International Accreditation
Forum (IAF) determined that the system for achieving IAF Multilateral
Agreements (MLA) for EMS would likely not be in place until November
2000. In the meantime, accreditation bodies can proceed to achieve
recognition of their systems for Quality Management Systems (QMS)
under the ISO 9001 process, upon with the EMS system will be based.
Presentation of the individual action plans revealed the various
stages of development in IAF membership and achieving international
recognition for QMS accreditation schemes, as well as progress related
to laying the groundwork for eventually achieving the MLA for EMS. The
partner economies were divided into three major categories of
development: (i) members of IAF who have achieved a QMS/MLA (Malaysia
and Singapore); (ii) members of IAF who have not yet achieved an MLA
(Hong Kong, Korea, Philippines, Taiwan R.O.C., Thailand); and (iii)
not-yet members of IAF (India, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Vietnam). Within
these major groupings, individual stages of advancement determined the
projected milestones and schedules of activities for each individual
action plan.
During the presentations, a number of issues were raised and
possible solutions discussed. These issues can be summarized as:
verification of documentation for IAF membership; developing an
organizational structure that meets requirements of ISO�s Conformity
Assessment Committee (ISO/CASCO), with particular emphasis on
independence and impartiality; training and maintaining experience of
accreditation assessors; interpretation and translation of ISO/IEC
Guides and IAF guidance documents; identification of competent
internal auditors; the need to maintain continuity in representation
at IAF meetings; and timing, personnel and organizational constraints
to achieving the UNIDO model for Pre-Peer Evaluations. It was agreed
that accreditation bodies should not play an active role in the
promotion of demand for ISO 14001 certifications, in view of the
potential conflicts of interest that may arise.
In response to the issues raised, a number of planned and
recommended activities were identified: (i) establishment of a
regionally based electronics communications forum, to facilitate
mutual assistance and information exchange; (ii) carry out limited
pre-peer assessments in three economies: Korea, Taiwan, R.O.C. and
India, in January 2000. These would involve a rapid review of the
accreditation system and recommended measures to rectify deficiencies
prior to the application for a full peer review and signing of an MLA.
The pre-peer assessments would be undertaken by Mr. Michael Ross of
ANSI/RAB and Mr. Chin Miew Lim of DSM/Malaysia, with observers from
the partner economies, so as to expand the benefit of the assessments
and as a mentoring exercise; (iii) plan an accreditation assessor
training course; (iv) pursue various intra-regional programs and
initiatives, which include such recommended activities, as: design and
implementation of joint training programs, sharing representation at
international meetings through "pairing" arrangements, and use of
electronic fora for information exchange; and (v) explore the
possibility of a third workshop, following the pre-peer assessments in
the first quarter 2000.
Delegates were unanimous in their praise of workshop organization
and content. A major outcome of these workshops has been increased
communication, collaboration and mutual support among accreditation
bodies within the region and with counterpart organizations in the
United States.
US-AEP/CTEM conducted an ISO 14001 workshop in San Francisco,
California, from June 14-21, designed to help US-AEP�s cooperating
countries and territories establish internationally recognized
accreditation systems for ISO 14001.
In addition to attending the
workshop, representatives from accreditation bodies in Hong Kong,
Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan
and Thailand participated in meetings of the International Standards
Organization�s (ISO) Technical Committee 207, which was created to
establish standards for environmental management tools and systems.
Workshop sessions were conducted by ISO 14000 experts from the U.S.
Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to TC 207, Global Environment &
Technology Fund (GETF), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
American National Standards Institute
(ANSI), Registrar Accreditation Board, and ISO Task Force for
Developing Countries (DEVCO).
Based on the needs expressed by the Asian participants, an Action
Plan was developed that leads the accreditation bodies through a
time-phased process and culminates with international recognition of
their accreditation system. This plan designates a six-stage path for
each accreditation body, beginning with efforts to establish
conformity with ISO/IEC Guide 61 (the current guide for conformity
assessment for quality management); assessment of local conditions and
demand for certification and accreditation; and development of
preliminary timetables for self-assessment and "friendly" audits with
regional colleagues and international experts to address
nonconformity.
Progress will be reviewed at a second, regionally based workshop
supported by US-AEP in late 1998-early 1999. Through these activities,
US-AEP�s cooperating countries and territories will move toward
accreditation for their environmental management systems in tandem
with the industrialized countries.
Back to the CTEM
page.
Back to the
Corporate Environmental Management page.