3. Applicable U.S.
Restrictions.
Recently, the use of trade restrictions as a means of imposing environmental policies on foreign countries
has gained favor.
Trade restrictions in the name of environmental quality may be grouped into four categories. The first
category includes regulations on imports and exports adopted by all nations to safeguard their domestic
resources and environment and to protect public health and safety. The imposition of such restrictions
has traditionally been considered the prerogative of each sovereign state. The second category of trade
restrictions is increasingly used as a policy tool to enforce environmental standards in international
agreements. As discussed in the prior sections, these international conventions are subject to substantial
debate and their enforcement is in question.
The third means of imposing trade restrictions is fairly controversial. States with stringent environmental
controls are questioning the adequacy of environmental controls in other nations. The concern, however,
is not merely about environmental issues but is tied to fears of unfair competition from foreign companies
that are not subject to strict pollution controls. As a means of correcting these two perceived problems,
a nation may employ unilateral trade restrictions to enforce national environmental objectives and induce
the other nations to adopt equal environmental protections. Such measures often take the form of a
surcharge or a ban on the import of certain goods. One such example of this has been the use of fish
product embargoes by the United States. The U.S. has used such embargoes to achieve conservation and
environmental objectives, the best known of which is probably the U.S. Tuna Ban where, pursuant to the
Marine Mammal Protection Act, the United States banned imports of yellowfin tuna from countries that
used dolphin-unfriendly methods. However, this type of trade restriction is subject to the provisions of
the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) which forbids prohibitions and restrictions on
exports.
Finally, the fourth category of environmental trade restrictions consists of controls on the export of
hazardous products, technologies, and waste. Countries may ban the export of products that are barred
from use in their own territory, they may permit the export of those products under regulations that
require prior informed consent, or may negotiate multilateral approaches to the problem that adopt
international standards for the hazards involved.
For example, the export of pesticides is regulated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA). The Act requires the registration of all pesticides sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
Before an unregistered pesticide may be lawfully exported from the United States, the foreign purchaser
must acknowledge in writing that the chemical is unregistered for us in the United States. This written
statement which the exporter is required to obtain, must be submitted to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency who then forwards copies to U.S. embassies in the importing countries for submission
to appropriate officials. The US EPA is also required to notify foreign governments and international
agencies when the registered status of a pesticide is canceled or suspended. Exported pesticides must also
be adequately labeled as registered or unregistered under U.S. law.
The export of hazardous wastes has also been the subject of international negotiation. The Basel
Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal (Basel
Convention) requires detailed notification and consent of the receiving country as a precondition for
authorizing international waste shipments. Upon receipt of an exporters notice of intent to ship hazardous
waste, the competent authority of the exporting country must provide the intended importing country, as
well as any transit countries, with written notification of the proposed shipment. The notification must
furnish detailed information, including the contractual parties, the terms, the composition and quantity
of the waste, the measures to be taken in care of an accident, insurance data, and the proposed place and
method of disposal. The importing country and any transit countries must submit a written response
consenting to the shipment, denying permission for it, imposing conditions or requesting further
information. Furthermore, under the Convention, parties must prohibit the export of the waste whenever
there is reason to believe that it will not be managed in an environmentally sound manner.